<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Life Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifetheory.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifetheory.com</link>
	<description>Perception speaks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time &#8211; a force or a consequence? by Me</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2011/03/time-a-force-or-a-consequence/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=543#comment-476</guid>
		<description> Actually, I typed in life theory and found it on Google.  

I was trying to catch up on some posts last week,  figured I wasn&#039;t the only one out there questioning everything, did a search, and here I am!  I&#039;ve only managed to get through your most recent posts, but it&#039;s been a pretty interesting read so far!  I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll see more comments as I go through.  I&#039;d be happy to hear any thoughts you might have on my ideas as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Actually, I typed in life theory and found it on Google.  </p>
<p>I was trying to catch up on some posts last week,  figured I wasn&#8217;t the only one out there questioning everything, did a search, and here I am!  I&#8217;ve only managed to get through your most recent posts, but it&#8217;s been a pretty interesting read so far!  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll see more comments as I go through.  I&#8217;d be happy to hear any thoughts you might have on my ideas as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time &#8211; a force or a consequence? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2011/03/time-a-force-or-a-consequence/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=543#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your reply! Great insights :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply! Great insights <img src='http://www.lifetheory.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time &#8211; a force or a consequence? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2011/03/time-a-force-or-a-consequence/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=543#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment! It seems we share a similar perception of time and space; particularly the notion of &quot;the moment&quot;. The moment, or space, is non-changing as space (although the size/shape of space possibly could change), and therefore everything that ever was and ever will be is contained here, now. In this sense, time is - as expressed in the article, simply a consequence of motion [of something] - matter, light, thoughts, feelings - anything that is.

It is interesting to probe into your point about &quot;storing&quot; each second, microsecond. You could keep dividing each unit of time either a) forever, or b) at a definitive point (or non-point). Either way, what remains is here and what remains is now. Perhaps the deeper one probes, the more of &quot;time&quot; is encapsulated. In other words, at high energy levels (passed atoms, through the planck scale), time and space - and everything in it, merge. At the deepest level, all of the universe(s) has only one point (or non-point) and everything that ever was, is and will be, is found. It may be the singularity in which everything arises.

Just curious, where did you find this website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment! It seems we share a similar perception of time and space; particularly the notion of &#8220;the moment&#8221;. The moment, or space, is non-changing as space (although the size/shape of space possibly could change), and therefore everything that ever was and ever will be is contained here, now. In this sense, time is &#8211; as expressed in the article, simply a consequence of motion [of something] &#8211; matter, light, thoughts, feelings &#8211; anything that is.</p>
<p>It is interesting to probe into your point about &#8220;storing&#8221; each second, microsecond. You could keep dividing each unit of time either a) forever, or b) at a definitive point (or non-point). Either way, what remains is here and what remains is now. Perhaps the deeper one probes, the more of &#8220;time&#8221; is encapsulated. In other words, at high energy levels (passed atoms, through the planck scale), time and space &#8211; and everything in it, merge. At the deepest level, all of the universe(s) has only one point (or non-point) and everything that ever was, is and will be, is found. It may be the singularity in which everything arises.</p>
<p>Just curious, where did you find this website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time &#8211; a force or a consequence? by Me</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2011/03/time-a-force-or-a-consequence/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=543#comment-473</guid>
		<description> 
Quote: &quot;In fact, I sense that time is in many ways an illusion in the
 sense that it only exists or comes to light when there is motion in 
space.&quot;

I agree, to a degree.  Time is a simply a measurement of cause and effect, which in this case what you refer to as &quot;motion&quot;.  Time itself does not actually exist.  


Quote: &quot;Unless all information is simultaneous and both, finite and infinite.  Only at that point, time will truly not exist.&quot;

The most practical way for the universe to exist IS to exist moment to moment.  If you stored each second, each lapse in time, our universe would grow exponentially.  It would be like a  database, storing the information of life.  If you only have it store the moment, it will add and remove data on the fly, keeping it&#039;s tables relatively clean and within a reasonable amount of space.  However, if you store each moment - in it&#039;s entirety - moment to moment, the database would fill up instantly.  It would have to store data to microseconds as well as whole seconds. Which, based on the fact there is an infinite number of moments between 0 and 1 second, would keep us from ever getting to 1.

To help explain why the universe is both infinite and finite however, here is a link to Nassim Haramein - Crossing the Event Horizon.  This is an amazing theory about how our universe is actually both and why it makes logical sense.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4907540922643918266&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Infinites inside Finites&lt;/a&gt;




You can also read more of my ideas on it at &lt;a href=&quot;Highthoughts.me&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Highthoughts.me&lt;/a&gt;


.

Great blog, don&#039;t stop questioning or posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
Quote: &#8220;In fact, I sense that time is in many ways an illusion in the<br />
 sense that it only exists or comes to light when there is motion in<br />
space.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree, to a degree.  Time is a simply a measurement of cause and effect, which in this case what you refer to as &#8220;motion&#8221;.  Time itself does not actually exist.  </p>
<p>Quote: &#8220;Unless all information is simultaneous and both, finite and infinite.  Only at that point, time will truly not exist.&#8221;</p>
<p>The most practical way for the universe to exist IS to exist moment to moment.  If you stored each second, each lapse in time, our universe would grow exponentially.  It would be like a  database, storing the information of life.  If you only have it store the moment, it will add and remove data on the fly, keeping it&#8217;s tables relatively clean and within a reasonable amount of space.  However, if you store each moment &#8211; in it&#8217;s entirety &#8211; moment to moment, the database would fill up instantly.  It would have to store data to microseconds as well as whole seconds. Which, based on the fact there is an infinite number of moments between 0 and 1 second, would keep us from ever getting to 1.</p>
<p>To help explain why the universe is both infinite and finite however, here is a link to Nassim Haramein &#8211; Crossing the Event Horizon.  This is an amazing theory about how our universe is actually both and why it makes logical sense.</p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4907540922643918266" rel="nofollow">Infinites inside Finites</a></p>
<p>You can also read more of my ideas on it at <a href="Highthoughts.me" rel="nofollow">Highthoughts.me</a></p>
<p>.</p>
<p>Great blog, don&#8217;t stop questioning or posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time &#8211; a force or a consequence? by Ac6424</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2011/03/time-a-force-or-a-consequence/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Ac6424</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 03:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=543#comment-472</guid>
		<description>
Quote:&quot;In fact, I sense that time is in many ways an illusion in the sense that it only exists or comes to light when there is motion in space.&quot;

Reply:
To me space and time are hard to differentiate.  Reason being that, as you put it, time appears to come to light only when there is motion.  However, I see that as the perceived value of time.  Meaning that it is the only way that we currently are able to measure time.  However the fact that there is a human being with consciousness, makes motion irrelevant in measuring time.  IN other words as long as there is consciousness everything could stand still and we would still perceive time.  This leads to the creation or formation of information.  As long as there is information there is time.  Unless all information is simultaneous and both, finite and infinite.  Only at that point, time will truly not exist.  So in conclusion, to me, time is a force.  Furthermore, it is a force similar to gravity.  Gravity is a force measurable with respect to mass, whereas time is a force measurable to space.  The problem is that we  don&#039;t have enough knowledge of  space as we we do of mass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:&#8221;In fact, I sense that time is in many ways an illusion in the sense that it only exists or comes to light when there is motion in space.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reply:<br />
To me space and time are hard to differentiate.  Reason being that, as you put it, time appears to come to light only when there is motion.  However, I see that as the perceived value of time.  Meaning that it is the only way that we currently are able to measure time.  However the fact that there is a human being with consciousness, makes motion irrelevant in measuring time.  IN other words as long as there is consciousness everything could stand still and we would still perceive time.  This leads to the creation or formation of information.  As long as there is information there is time.  Unless all information is simultaneous and both, finite and infinite.  Only at that point, time will truly not exist.  So in conclusion, to me, time is a force.  Furthermore, it is a force similar to gravity.  Gravity is a force measurable with respect to mass, whereas time is a force measurable to space.  The problem is that we  don&#8217;t have enough knowledge of  space as we we do of mass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not trying to be philosophical, but&#8230; by PrestonsMomma</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2010/09/not-trying-to-be-philosophical-but/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>PrestonsMomma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=402#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Wow...this is amazing. Exactly what I needed to read. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;this is amazing. Exactly what I needed to read. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Being unified in separation by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2010/07/being-unified-in-separation/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=245#comment-410</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Rickshrader. Yes, we all exist in a center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Rickshrader. Yes, we all exist in a center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Being unified in separation by Rickshrader</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2010/07/being-unified-in-separation/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickshrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=245#comment-409</guid>
		<description>All existence is the eye of the beholder.One centerpoint unites all existence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All existence is the eye of the beholder.One centerpoint unites all existence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Being. Dead. You cannot be in both. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2010/10/being-dead-you-cannot-be-in-both/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=414#comment-408</guid>
		<description>...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Being. Dead. You cannot be in both. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2010/10/being-dead-you-cannot-be-in-both/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=414#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Tashi delek, Sonam-la! Hope all is well with you! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tashi delek, Sonam-la! Hope all is well with you! <img src='http://www.lifetheory.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not trying to be philosophical, but&#8230; by chaglen</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2010/09/not-trying-to-be-philosophical-but/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>chaglen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=402#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for your kind comment! Let&#039;s have a back and fourth dialogue on these issues. Just throw in more comments or questions. By the way, how did you come across this website? Just curious :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for your kind comment! Let&#8217;s have a back and fourth dialogue on these issues. Just throw in more comments or questions. By the way, how did you come across this website? Just curious <img src='http://www.lifetheory.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not trying to be philosophical, but&#8230; by Penil Doshi</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2010/09/not-trying-to-be-philosophical-but/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Penil Doshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=402#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Hey....This is amazing stuff!!
Your attitude is astounding and well sculptured!!The level of understanding is sublime, and you have it all going the right way, it seems :D 
Well, i have read some books about this sorta stuff, and it is inevitable that you re in a profoundly well-established and ORIGINAL state of LIFE.
I would appreciate if you could advise me with something so terrific yet basic.I do have some understanding abt it but its like &#039;seems to be true&#039;..
Wish to look for your guidance.
Goodluck!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8230;.This is amazing stuff!!<br />
Your attitude is astounding and well sculptured!!The level of understanding is sublime, and you have it all going the right way, it seems <img src='http://www.lifetheory.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Well, i have read some books about this sorta stuff, and it is inevitable that you re in a profoundly well-established and ORIGINAL state of LIFE.<br />
I would appreciate if you could advise me with something so terrific yet basic.I do have some understanding abt it but its like &#8216;seems to be true&#8217;..<br />
Wish to look for your guidance.<br />
Goodluck!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Being. Dead. You cannot be in both. by sonam</title>
		<link>http://www.lifetheory.com/2010/10/being-dead-you-cannot-be-in-both/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>sonam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifetheory.com/?p=414#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Tashi delek Dear christian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tashi delek Dear christian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

